Search

## Recent Posts

See AllAs I have stated in previous posts there is, in my opinion, a major contradiction or flaw in the multiplicative inverse axiom that we rigorously use to help define division in mathematics. This is wh

394

Here is my issue with division. We write and say it as 1 divided by 2 or 1/2. If we attempt to show the long hand solution we write it backwards and says 2 divides into 1. This just doesn't make lo

250